Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Morrall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Caitlin Morrall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Morrall was Miss Wisconsin USA. This alone is not enough to establish notability. Her local morning traffic reporting position does not seem to be notable. I did find a passing reference to her leaving that position in an article in the Milwaukie Journal Sentinel, but I don't think that is the type of coverage we need to pass GNG. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I disagree, Miss Wisconsin USA can be enough with proper citations. Plus she was very close in the Miss Wisconsin title several times helps. The article meets WP:GNG with articles about her pageantry in several reputable Wisconsin newspapers in different communities.  Royal broil  03:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment For this to move beyond localized one event, we would either need coverage outside Wisconsin, or we would need coverage for something other than being Miss Wisconsin. Being a non-winner does not get anything aproaching significant coverage anywhere and so can not be cited for anything.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The following list should show that Miss Insert State here is not a notable award. There has been a huge number of discussions over the last six months that establish this Articles for deletion/Ashlee Baracy (2nd nomination), Articles for deletion/Abby Hancock, Articles for deletion/Amy Crain, Articles for deletion/Ashley Halfman, Articles for deletion/Beth Stomps, Articles for deletion/Dellynne Catching are just a few. That is not delving into the very closely related Miss instert state USA winners, who even more articles on have been deleted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:31, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a state level pageant win is insufficient for notability as shown at numerous prior AfDs. Coverage is all routine & WP:MILL: "local resident gets award". Such pages are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, not a vote. There is a similar issue with Jodi Unruh, also listed on journalism right now, having won a Miss Oregon pageant. I don't vote on pageants and so I really do not know if this state-level win qualifies a person for notability. And I do not have an opinion about this. But I do think the two articles should be treated equally. Crtew (talk)
 * Delete - Being a beauty pageant winner and traffic reporter is not enough in itself to prove notability.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a trivial and unconvincing article about a state-focused pageant. SwisterTwister   talk  23:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.