Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Todd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 05:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Caitlin Todd

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article does not establish notability of the character independent of its series. No reliable third party sources and just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. McWomble (talk) 08:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nomination; article bears no evidence of having received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject as dictated by the notability guidelines. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 13:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep These:, , |95388|1|,00.html all show some real world notability to the character. Specifically, her death. Otherwise, the article needs cleanup, not deletion. Umbralcorax (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm not convinced that those are reliable sources. In any case they are more about the show and the actor than the character. Such information would be more appropriate in NCIS (TV series). If by "cleanup" you mean "remove the plot summary and original research" there would be little or nothing left to justify a separate article. The character only needs a one paragraph summary in List of NCIS characters. McWomble (talk) 06:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Characters of NCIS as a plausible search term. No notability outside of NCIS.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of NCIS characters as the character does not stand separate from the TV series (note: the proposed target is in dire need for major editorial surgery per the articleissues tag). B.Wind (talk) 03:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's a notable character and WP:N is not a policy. And the character only exists in the series, so it's impossible to for it be worthy of notice "indepedent of its series." And stop stealing TTN's AFD nominations. --Pixelface (talk) 03:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Some sourcing exists on gnews but it is pretty weak tea. Lots of series reviews/previews that namecheck the character and actress and move along.  Nothing you could call significant coverage.  However, since that is subjective, it is a "weak" delete. Protonk (talk) 03:56, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.