Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caito's Rule


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -R. fiend 06:39, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Caito's Rule

 * Delete - Not notable Vanity/advert with no encyclopedic value - T&#949;x &#964;  ur&#949;  20:45, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  21:36, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism, vanity and not notable. --GraemeL (talk) 12:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete - Widely accepted nomenclature through long-standing internet community - BobM59 User:BobM59 13:38, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete - Widely accepted nomenclature through long-standing internet community. Has value as new language of pop culture. -antagonist77


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.