Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cake Prophecy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Author hasn't edited since, but if they want it userfied they can drop a note on my talkpage (or indeed that of any admin). -Splash talk 02:51, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Cake Prophecy
tagged as speedy, but does not seem to fit a speedy cat. This is, however, a description of some patently non-notable fiction,and also appears to fail WP:NOR (and quite possibly WP:NFT) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 16:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC) Actually I have seen the first novel published, although only in Western Australia. Maybe it is going mainstream soon? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.69.205.7 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. The books sound interesting, but Wikipedia can only dedicate articles to novels that are published and well-circulated. There are better places on the web to promote your work, anyway. ×Meegs 01:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn nonsense. incog 00:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as junk. Stifle 16:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This is not junk, but if it doesn't belong in Wikipedia, say so. The author probably took an hour to write it, you hopefully took a minute to read it, and I suggest it's worth 15 seconds to give a real reason for deletion instead of just insulting the author, who contributed in good faith. ×Meegs 18:42, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete above comment is far too kind. 15 seconds is all it takes to see that this falls into WP:NOT. Definitely doesn't belong on WP - tells of books which only exist in author's mind. Camillus (talk) 01:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * As you may know, I am broadly in favour of userfying well-intentioned but naive articles (assuming good faith, obv.) like this and autobiographies, per WP:BITE. If a consensus emerges to delete and I end up closing the AfD I will probably do that. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] 21:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and userfy, because of notability issues. --kingboyk 00:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Royboycrashfan 01:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, straddles the line between fiction and patent nonsense. People can spend 6 years writing fiction if they want. This still won't be where to put it and no amount of unsigned desperate rescue attempts will change that. ++Deiz 02:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.