Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cakes society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 00:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Cakes society

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Ok, this is the "Cakes Appreciation Society" that does... I don't seem to know. Also, the founder "likes to keep things British"? I say Delete. Diez2 00:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly a non-notable subject, and I can't see how the article could be expanded beyond a stub. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  01:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Philippe Beaudette 05:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No assertion of notability. No references or ghits.  skip (t / c) 07:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - non notable. Non verifiable (BTW: no google hit), maybe it is an hoax or an attack. Cate |Talk 09:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I like cake Dave 10:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:V, WP:N. Terence Ong 10:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 11:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, and Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. --sunstar nettalk 12:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing about this can be verified, no references present --Urbanshakedown 15:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No, there is one Google hit... And that is the Wikipedia page. :-) אמר Steve Caruso ( desk / AMA ) •  Give Back Our Membership!  15:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - ... so there might even be one yahoo hit if we are lucky... also wiki --Jack Jones 11 16:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG, WP:V.-- danntm T C 20:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete-WP:ORG. (I wonder what they eat all day :))--TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 00:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete junk. JuJube 22:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.