Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cal South Soccer League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 09:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Cal South Soccer League

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable soccer (or football in Europe) league. Written like an advertisement, no sources whatsoever. STORMTRACKER   94  Go Irish! 13:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.   A R  TYOM    13:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this link gives some information regarding the league's statewide proliferation. The article should be renamed California Youth Soccer Association. Vishnava (talk) 14:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed that the present condition is terrible. Vishnava (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with Number 57. Didn't know about WP:CSD Vishnava (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. A new article at the title suggested above can be started from scratch. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  14:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable soruces to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 14:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and if possible rewrite as a non-ad, per above. Something this large ought to be notable, but I have a hard time finding secondary sources. And by the way, CSSL doesn't stand for "Cal South Soccer League", but for "Cal South Signature League". -- Jao (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - What can be done in a rewrite. As you've pointed out yourself, there are no sources for something that should have some given the size.  I can't even determine what their website is from a google search.  It might be this or it might be this but none of the names actually match the name of the article.  I don't see how we can possibly meet verifiability without any sense that even the name of the organisation is correct. -- Whpq (talk) 18:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman (talk) 19:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, promo, little apparent notability. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.