Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cala d’Hort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 02:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Cala d’Hort

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising. No reliable sources added. The Banner talk 13:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - Named place of verified existence, keep per longstanding consensus. Carrite (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Per WP:NGEO. This is not an article about a business that fails to assert notability, it's about a named geographical location or natural feature. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep – This is an article about named geographical location or natural feature. It Has both sources, and indication of significance. keep per longstanding consensus. Dennisbluie (talk) 08:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep – I have read this article through and can not see where this article could possible be accused of advertising. Its content is about a beach, a natural feature of this island. It is well referenced there is no reason for deletionDemax (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to be a legitimate geographical place, geological feature, and possibly a populated place. Under all our guidelines and essays regarding these subjects, I see no grounds for deletion. Any POV issues are stylistic and editorial and largely surmountable problems. I also believe this is technically a Blue Flag beach which makes it no small average beach. For example, while spain has many, Canada only has 11. Mkdw talk 05:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.