Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calabogie Motorsports Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. There were plenty of sources available, I just had to look around for suitable ones. I've fixed up the article to a serviceable shape - mind you, there aren't very many sources which talk about the park itself, but I think this is one case where notability has to be inherited (after all, it would be boring if newspapers put out coverage about a 5-kilometer strip of asphalt and not the Porsche 911s going 225km/h on it). m.o.p 14:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Calabogie Motorsports Park

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article without really usefull information Night of the Big Wind (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. Racetracks are generally notable, but this is a new track where few events have taken place to make it notable per se. The facility has potential to become notable (this ain't no quarter-mile oval), so I'll support keeping it.  The only real problem is that the article is a weak effort so far and needs help.   PK  T (alk)  19:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I agree that this article is weak in quality and content, but it could easily be improved. Secondarywaltz (talk) 13:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails both WP:V and WP:GNG. No reliable sources have been specified either in the article or this discussion. There is nothing in the article that would provide a basis for it being kept. TerriersFan (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per TerriersFan. It can always be re-added later if events and references merit  --rogerd (talk) 22:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.