Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calamity Adventure 2: People and Traditions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Closing as soft delete per low participation in the discussion. North America1000 03:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Calamity Adventure 2: People and Traditions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable video game, no third party sources, never got a real release. Wizardman 16:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  00:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: normally I would suggest a merge or redirect to the developer, Lightspan, except that article doesn't exist despite the company being more notable than any of their individual games. Notability for the company and their games as a whole from and  and enough academic studies to warrant a metastudy  (which I sadly don't have access to, beyond seeing that it exists). If anyone feels like having a go at creating Lightspan then that would be great, especially if they have access to the academic literature. If not, then deletion is probably the best option here. Lowercaserho (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.