Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calathumpian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Calathumpian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails verification. The primary use of the word (spelled Callithumpian ) appears to be an adjective to describe a loud and boisterous band. The use of "some other political/religious belief" is used in some sources, but the use is generally just as a nonce word, with no continuity of meaning between sources. The links in the references currently in the article don't work, but they only claim to support that the word was used in Australian parliament debate. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:39, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I guess, needs a WP:TNT at least. The main usage should probably be mentioned at charivari, as it is "no doubt derived" from the latter and is described as a very similar act of noisy "musical" public harassment of the unpopular or socially censured  . Several improbable etymologies of this meaning are dicussed here.
 * However, the sense of "one who claims an imaginary religion, joc." doesn't seem to have enough sourcing to make an article. There's a short 1955 letter to the editor in American Speech in which it's defined, given as Australian, and hypothesized to have originated as a description of the Holy Rollers before being contrasted to the more common "musical" usage. That's enough for a sentence somewhere, but not an article. FourViolas (talk) 00:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment (if verified) this would be a dictionary definition, but the main issue seems to be that one politician used the term in a speech, perhaps mispronouncing it. If so, it is NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.