Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calculator++


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as spam Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Calculator++

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The notability of this product isn't established by the article, and given that it was released four days ago I doubt that it has achieved notability. Largo Plazo (talk) 06:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete++ per nom. This is obviously not a notable software product.  JBsupreme (talk) 06:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - although nom is satisfied that this is not advertising I'm not as sure. I note that the publisher has the same name as the article's author. Additionally, I'm not convinced about some of the claims of uniqueness put forward. In the end this is just another software calculator. The bar for software notability is pretty high. We need to see evidence of third party published reviews and users who can only do their particular work because of this product. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete possible advertising, no reliable references, and relatively new and not notable. --Banime (talk) 10:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a manual. Also fails Notability -- Flewis (talk) 10:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy--: blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 11:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete++, just another calculator program. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.