Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calculator Football


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Calculator Football
A schoolboy calculator game which is not notable in any sense (even if it actually exists). Seems linked to other possible hoaxes at Jared Nash and Eli Makowski. Pudgey 11:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per nomination; not notable (if it even exists) --Mhking 17:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NFT with flying colours. Oh look, we're generating random numbers, and pretending we're playing Aussie football! Whatever will they think of next? J I P  | Talk 11:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as your classic WP:NFT case. I'm amused by the article's claim that a calculator cricket game was invented in 2004, since one is already known to every Australian student from the earliest days of calculators with random-number generators. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Can you explain whether there's really any difference between Calculator Cricket and Calculator Football, other than the difference in the sport pretended to be played? Is it all just a series of seeing who has the larger random number, or are there more complicated rules? Could I create, say, Calculator Petanque simply by taking Calculator Cricket and replacing each mention of "cricket" with "petanque"? J I P  | Talk 12:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NFT, as well as several other policies and guidelines. Question, though: do calculators made in Manchester do any better at this than those made in Sunderland? Guy 13:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY DELETE per nom JoshTyler 14:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC) .  Josh.
 * Delete - Non-notable time-waster for programmable calculators. Caknuck 16:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Kf4bdy talk contribs 17:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources to get pass WP:NFT.-- danntm T C 19:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * In 2004 students yada yada yada Delete Danny Lilithborne 20:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Caution is advised as at least one of these noxious hoaxes (Jared Nash) was a repost from about 2 weeks previous. I request an administrator check out what else this account has been up to. Also, someone may want to keep an eye on this dude and ensure that he doesn't repost these AGAIN. Thanx. 68.39.174.238 23:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.