Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calculus jokes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete.  Voice -of- All T 22:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Calculus jokes
Delete is a Joke, worth BJAODN? Royal Blue 04:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I changed my signature. That aside, delete. It's not even funny. Roy boycr ash fan [[Image:Flag_of_Texas.svg|30px]] 04:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nome. Bobby1011 04:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic. Not worth a BJAODN, though that might because I'm biased, as I've heard something like this before and wasn't particularly thrilled by it back then either.  -- Kinu  t /c  06:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, anything that tries to get BJAODNed (which in my mind, this is), should be consigned to "Wiki-Hell"! -- Saberwyn 10:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't drink and derive create nonsense on Wikipedia. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 11:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Edgar181 12:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not an math joke repository. &mdash;ERcheck @ 19:02, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - could be a BJAODN but this is an old one. --Tone 19:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete an old, unfunny joke; appears to have been written for BJAODN inclusion and articles that aspire to that low standard of writing shouldn't merit an inclusion in an encyclopædia.  (aeropagitica)   22:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.