Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calcutta Blues Band


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 18:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Calcutta Blues Band

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not very knowledgeable about bands and even less so about Bengali bands. However, the article appears to fail the criteria at WP:BAND. Of the two references currently in the article, only one (the first) is valid as the other doesn't even mention the band. The first is a very short mention in the The Times of India about the one album that has been released by the band and has become "popular". Although not strictly related to notability, the article was created by a band member, as was another article created about a band member (I deleted that one based on a speedy tag) that was apparently created by two band members (two accounts). Bbb23 (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Relevant reference is trivial, and there is only one of them. Fails all other inclusion criteria. Benboy00 (talk) 18:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 15:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The only two references given speak to the band's lack of notability. One exclaims that 150 fans have signed up for a fan club. The other peripherally mentions the band among others as playing at a mall.--Rpclod (talk) 00:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It fails WP:42. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.