Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calderside Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Centrx→talk &bull; 01:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Calderside Academy

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

no assertion of notability, see also Articles for deletion/Earnock High School Closure — Swpb talk contribs 01:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Only fact about the school is its location and that it's under construction. Everything else is unsupported opinion. —C.Fred (talk) 01:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup - yes it is a total mess, but the claim of community controversy seems to suggest that this might be more notable than the average school (and let's not forget that some editors, though not me, are of the opinion that a school is automatically notable.)-- Dmz5 *Edits**Talk* 05:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well in that case, those editors can make their case on this page. — Swpb talk contribs 05:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * And I would argue that this school is probably less notable than the average school, given that it doesn't even exist yet. Long-established schools tend to be more likely to have had some notable event or alumnus - this school makes no claim to either. — Swpb talk contribs 06:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources, and WP:NOT a crystal ball. Write the article when the school is constructed. Shimeru 10:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources - school estimated to be 6 months away from being built. Once built and open, then notability would arguably be achieved and deserve its own article  •C H ILL DO UBT•     16:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to South Lanarkshire. Article is premature per WP:SCHOOL, but belongs as an issue discussed at the municipal level. Redirect will allow article to be recreated once additional material is available to satisfy notability. WP:SCHOOL and WP:SCHOOLS3 agree on very little, other than the fact that consensus has been reached that non-notable articles be targets of a merge/redirect. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alansohn (talk • contribs) 17:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Merge agree with Alansohn, this is premature... merge content and wait until enough material exists.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 18:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to South Lanarkshire per above until better sources are available. RFerreira 19:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Clear delete crystal ball, etc... Eusebeus 21:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Schools open and close all the time; this doesn't make them notable. The article is also inadequately referenced. WMMartin 22:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no references. Article can be created after construction. ← A NAS  Talk? 02:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.