Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caldicot Comprehensive School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP.  Rob e  rt  T 03:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Caldicot Comprehensive School
This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 11:43, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep &mdash; Schools covering ages 16-18 are notable, at least to me. &mdash; RJH 17:42, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep like all the others. I've categorised it. CalJW 17:55, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have other schools articles. Carioca 23:01, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow, it's got 6 blocks, a head teacher and a nearby park. I don't see anything that warrants an article here. Delete (or merge to whatever school district this falls in). - Mgm|(talk) 23:18, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Not keep. Seems like a clear merge candidate (as this is demographic info only), but in the exceedingly unlikely case of a consensus to delete, that would be okay, too. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 23:23, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your recent less confrontational approach. Kappa 01:45, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I've never really objected to a merge solution; I just should have been making it clearer. Of course, ideally I'd like to see a transwiki to a license-compatible school-coverage wiki, but, in the absence of one, that's not an option. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 01:50, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. I don't think it's a good idea to merge British secondary schools, especially when the article explains its function in the local community (Leisure centre). Kappa 01:45, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn school --JAranda &#124; watz sup 02:04, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. --Vsion 07:36, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I can remember someone discussing a year-old school stub in AFD recently (don't remember the link). To me that shows, that separate stubs are just as hard - if not harder- to find to editors. - Mgm|(talk) 11:58, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * keepHipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 12:47, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. There is no consensus at all to delete high schools, as is illustrated by Watch/schoolwatch/Votes for deletion archive.  Merging this article is not a viable option.  Silensor 23:50, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, clean and expand per the developing consensus at WP:SCH's talk page. HS's should be kept unless patently false or unverifiable.Gateman1997 18:36, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * keep and expand it too please Yuckfoo 01:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete makes no claim for notability Pete.Hurd 19:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as part of the fight against deletionist vandalism. The mere fact of something's existence warrants its inclusion.  Kurt Weber 21:42, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.