Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cale Oval


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 03:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Cale Oval

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD - unremarkable sports field that does not meet WP:NGEO.  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  05:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Passenger  pigeon  ( talk )  05:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm on the "use A7 sparingly" bandwagon, but this is close to an A7. SportingFlyer  T · C  13:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This is about the most unnotable place I have seen an article on, and that is saying something.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absolutely non-notable. -- Kinu t/c 01:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm sorry, but it couldn't be more not-notable. TheImaCow (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above --DannyS712 (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:GNG for a standalone article, a gsearch brings up the usual government announcements/local news about upgrades (like this), mentions about games played there (like this, and this), being closed due to covid does not make a facility wikinotable; is this even strictly correct - see this council media release that does not specifically list this oval, some words in a (as yet not there) "Facilities" section at Narromine including referring to the Concept Plan for the oval might be okay. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable for Wikipedia's quality standards. New3400 (talk) 14:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.