Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Guillotte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge and redirect to Deadeye Dick (band). Waggers (talk) 14:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Caleb Guillotte

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as NN autobiography Mayalld (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not worth merging to the band article because it's unsourced. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Deadeye Dick if any of the solo work can be properly sourced, Redirect if not. Deadeye Dick is notable enough to pass WP:MUSIC, and now I've got that New Age Girl song stuck in my head again. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Deadeye Dick (band) per Starblind. Might be a keeper if the band's claim to notability were stronger.  However, with no sourcing, a somewhat marginal claim to notability and plenty of room in the band article, merge/redirect is best.-- Kubigula (talk) 19:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Deadeye Dick (band). The band is barely notable; it's singer without the band certainly is not.--CastAStone|(talk) 18:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and fix the sources. Easily passes WP:N.  Members of notable bands are notable, an exception to the dictum that notability is not inherited. Bearian (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Over 500 Ghits, with an IMdB entry, charity work, etc. Bearian (talk) 18:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Added sources. Is that enough? Bearian (talk) 22:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You've done well to verify the information in the article, but these are all pretty trivial mentions. I still don't see a compelling argument for a separate article, and a merge seems like a better editorial decision.  I did, however, strike my comment saying there were no sources :).-- Kubigula (talk) 01:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, sources have been added. AnteaterZot (talk) 00:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not about sources, its about notability.--CastAStone//(talk) 04:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.