Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caliber Home Loans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Caliber Home Loans

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NCORP Sock creation.  scope_creep Talk  14:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another run of the mill business. WP is not a business directory. --Kbabej (talk) 17:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or Move to New Residential Investment Corp. The company has been bought out and there is recent news on this. I have added the new info and also added sources from MarketWatch and Dallas Morning News, which states its the 5th largest lender as a result of merger. Peter303x (talk) 20:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I see you have usual list of routine annoucements, press-releases and profiles that fail WP:SIRS and WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH.   scope_creep Talk  23:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 15:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages nor a platform for promotion. I cannot see a single reference that meets the criteria for establishing notability as per WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 12:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I only see one possibly reliable reference - Dallas News, that’s not really “substantial” coverage. Star7924 (talk) 14:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.