Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Azerbaijan Friendship Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

California Azerbaijan Friendship Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notabilty.Too soon by a mile:) Winged Blades Godric 10:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: Hello, the article was created in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia first. It was created by , a sysop in Azerbaijani Wikipedia, who is active since 2014/2015. The article should be kept, because it is the first organization to be created by Azerbaijanis and encompass a whole US state. It is a newly created organization, but it is believed that they will play huge role in the Azerbaijani-USA relations. I hope this is enough for keeping the article. White Demon can say more about the article. Sincerely: oyuncu aykhan fikrini de! 17:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * We don't care for other versions of WP do and are editorially independent.And, I believe that the organisation will deserve an article, only when they will play a huge role.Regards:) Winged Blades Godric 04:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. The organization was established on December 20, 2017 and the only coverage appears to be based on the press release about their launch party. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 12:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete the sourcing doesn't matter at all here, and I haven't reviewed it: I don't need to do that to be able to make a determination. This organization is small and was founded 27 days ago according to the infobox. Sourcing be damned, it isn't notable. If it is, then our guidelines are seriously flawed. Yes, this is a IDONTLIKEIT delete !vote, but it is one based on commonsense and reasoning, which we are supposed to take into account when it comes to forming consensus. We don't need an in-depth review of sourcing when something doesn't even present a prima facie argument for itself to be included, and we lack one here. Some common sense in the deletion process would be useful. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.