Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Closets (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Anachronist, CSD G5: Created by a banned or blocked user. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

California Closets
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreated following previous deletion in April 2017, however current version is claimed to be different (and Deletionpedia version differs substantially, so CSD G4 may not apply). Lack of WP:CORPDEPTH in sourcing. Current article has one good Newsweek source, the rest is PR and trade publications. Icewhiz (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Bay Area represent, but yeah, non-notable company with article fueled by primary sources, and zilch found in Google searches. Only time I ever hear of them is their radio commercials. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  17:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet Wp:NCORP plus signs of UPE editing are what tips this over the top. jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.