Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California College of Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Fram (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

California College of Music

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article covers an apparently non-notable for-proft limited liability company in Pasadena, California that does business as the unaccredited California College of Music. I can find no reliable sourcing whatsoever for the subject; every Google News archive hit I was able to find refers to the College of Music at USC. It appears to fail WP:ORG, and as such I am listing it here for further discussion. user:j   (aka justen)   18:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I can't find much either. I searched on "Pasadena International Music Academy", the previous name, and only got one significant piece, which was a podcast interview with the founder hosted on a local newspaper website. "Pasadena's California College of Music is one woman's dream come true" But it's been deleted off the site and the abstract makes it appear to have been more about the founder than the school anyway. So I'd agree that it does not meet the notability standards and should be deleted.    Will Beback    talk    18:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete no evidence of notability; would change if sources produced. JJL (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  — Lady  of  Shalott  02:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — Lady  of  Shalott  03:00, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  — Lady  of  Shalott  03:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Only article ProQuest has for this includes "University of Southern..." first. Jclemens (talk) 03:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - two references on current page. One is to the org's own page (self-published) and not sufficient to establish notability.  The second is to an unlinked news story in a single city's local newspaper.  A search of the news archive for the dates given didn't turn up any record of the headline.  So, no sources to help it pass notability guidelines.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 19:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.