Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Medical Marijuana Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, copyvio  Ged  UK  20:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

California Medical Marijuana Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No actual website and no gnews hits at all, which strongly indicates against notability for a brand new, U.S.-based organization.  MBisanz  talk 20:47, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There are two "references" given in the article. One is the organisation's own LinkedIn profile. The other is a business listing site, which confirms that the organisation exists, and little more, and does not mention the statement to which it is attached as a citation. A search produced nothing that could be regarded as significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I wouldn't use Linkedin as a reference as Linkedin is a social networking site.  The first "reference" just points to nothing to do with the article.  Plus the content in the article is just copied straight from their Linkedin profile.  So therefore it violates WP:COPY.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 23:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. I hadn't noticed the copyright infringement, but now that Fishhead2100 (who signs "Mr C.C.") has pointed it out I have tagged the article for a speedy deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.