Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California flaming faggot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 18:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

California flaming faggot

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a non-notable publication for which the only sources I could find are blogs and similarly unreliable references. The person apparently responsible for the publication is similarly non-notable. Pinkville (talk) 01:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * In fact, the only link provided doesn't appear to list the publication anyway... Pinkville (talk) 01:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  02:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability and a search on Google suggests non-notability. No reason the article shouldn't be recreated if the magazine gains a reasonable profile. --Simon Speed (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even an assertion of notability, as far as I can see. -- Hoary (talk) 00:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability, no independant sources. Edward321 (talk) 05:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - short-lived non-notable magazine. If no 3rd party sources have discussed it by now (per Googling), they never will.Yobmod (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.