Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calinfo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to California Technology Agency.  MBisanz  talk 23:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Calinfo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A topic about a website for the State of California's information technology employees that may fail WP:N. Source searching in GBooks and News archives are yielding information about a different topic, California Agency Libraries and Information Sources, but not this one. There's one source in the article, but topics on Wikipedia are typically to be supported by multiple reliable sources to qualify having a standalone article. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge with California Technology Agency, which its a part of, and which itself is currently only a stub. there isnt a lot of available info about this site, and its really exclusively for CALIT people, not the public, where the CTA is a public site. no prejudice against it becoming an article again if it wins the lottery or is found driving a white Ford Bronco down the freeway:)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:24, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment from an earlier PROD:
 * "I think this page should not be deleted because it talks about (and soon, with the help of users more interested in sharing information than deleting it, will describe more thourouhgly, I hope) a new site for California IT employees just as GCPEDIA describes the wiki for Canadian civil servants. In my opinion, it is worth its place in Wikipedia, along with Data.Gov, Intellipedia, etc. Besides, note that the speedy deletion request came just 7 minutes after the page was created and not 15 minutes as it is advised here (wow, TheDude2006, you are very fast)! --Popol0707 (talk) 01:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)" (placed here in the interest of fairness)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge per the well thought out arguments from Mercurywoodrose. --MelanieN (talk) 18:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.