Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CallMeCarson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

CallMeCarson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

YouTuber with a high number of subscribers and a large fanbase, but doubtful that he passes WP:GNG. Very little coverage in WP:RS, with the Newsweek article being the only decent source I can find. Dexerto, for instance, was decided to be generally unreliable per this discussion. Mbdfar (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of GNG. ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable Youtuber.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm seeing Newsweek and Distractify pieces, but not sure if those are enough to satisfy GNG. — Infogapp1 (talk) 11:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  18:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  18:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The sources provided above might be reliable for news but not for concluding anything about notability. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.