Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call Of Duty Forum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW J.delanoy gabs adds  18:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Call Of Duty Forum

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:WEB, no reliable sources providing independent coverage, but since it asserts notability, cannot be speedied under A7. MLauba (talk) 20:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MLauba (talk) 20:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, all sources provided are clearly unverifiable. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 21:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is a damn shame it cannot be speedy deleted because its quite obvious what the outcome should and will eventually be here.  JBsupreme (talk) 21:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Fails WP:WEB by a huge margin. References are completely unverifiable - they might as well have provided none at all. A quick look at the forum itself revealed that the most users logged in at once is 11. &mdash; Ledgend  Gamer  22:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Article claims "over 20,000" members, but the footer on the forum reveals that there are actually only 41. The article claims that the site is within Alexa's top 100K, but Alexa has no data on the board. The article claims that the board was "launched in March 2009", but the domain was only registered a week ago. Quite simply, this article isn't just describing a non-notable board - it's also full of obvious lies. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per Zetawoof's explanation. Alexius08 (talk) 23:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Article should have been speedy deleted instead of bringing it to AFD. --SkyWalker (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.