Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call of Dut Modern Warfare Two


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:03, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Call of Dut Modern Warfare Two

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article describes a proposed sequel to the latest in the Call of Duty video game series. A proposed sequel has actually been widely documented in the computer game press, but Activision describes talk of a sequel as 'speculative' - see, eg. If such a Call of Duty sequel were to be produced, much could change before it is released, including the question of whether the game will be released at all. This article is misspelled and contains no substantial content. Richard Cavell (talk) 00:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: If the developer has called the sequel speculative, then I see no reason why we should further such speculation. Also, the title is misspelled and the Call of Duty series has used numerals for past titles instead of spelling them out. There is little edit history, and the misspelling is an unlikely search term. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC))
 * Speedy Delete. There's absolutely no information here, not even enough for a stub. ("The 6th COD game will be the 6th COD game and it's going to be released next year"?) Marasmusine (talk) 10:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete The article should have been speedy deleted instead of AFD. The title of the game "Call of Dut Modern Warfare Two" is wrong the correct title is "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2" which is redirect to the main series. Currently Activision has said this is speculative. --SkyWalker (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete — I don't think this falls under any CSD category, but definitely deletable as pure crystalballery. MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.