Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Callenya lenya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP; an early WP:SNOW closure since articles like these don't have a snowball's chance etc. etc. See also WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. Rkitko (talk) 16:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Callenya lenya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphan stub with no real usefulness. Andrewman327 (talk) 07:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * All species have notability according to the wikipedia guidelines and so there is no reason to delete, furthermore, it is not even an orphan. Ruigeroeland (talk) 07:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep. All (biological) species are by convention considered notable. Were we to remove this one, we'd need to remove another million pages or so. There is good reason for Wikipedia to offer encyclopedic coverage of species, just as it offers a gazetteer of places, large and small. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, but not snow — that's a situation in which tons of people comment and all want to keep or delete; see WP:SNOW. As far as keeping: unless you can provide evidence that this is a hoax, there will be substantial information on it.  All documented species get surprisingly large amounts of coverage, as I found out when writing Cletocamptus helobius some time ago.  Nyttend (talk) 06:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * As you like. The species is already cited (Evans 1932, Corbet 1940) for its type description, as all species can and should be. I have added both of them in a new Bibliography section. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:57, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Snow keep as a verified butterfly species. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.