Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caloocan local elections, 2016


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Caloocan local elections, 2016

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local event. Articles such as this have already been deleted. KDS 4444 Talk  15:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. - supergabbyshoe
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    16:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    16:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - No comment for Las Piñas and Mandaluyong (probably delete until someone comes up with a good enough expansion), but both Makati and Caloocan has had election articles in the past that weren't AFDed and are still existing after two election cycles (2016 is the third one). – H T  D  20:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Caloocan has a population of over a million, so I have no idea how local elections there cannot be considered notable. It is far larger than many English districts and towns for which we have complete sets of election articles (e.g. Category:Council elections in Bolton Borough or Category:Tunbridge Wells Council elections), and on which there is consensus that the elections are notable. Deleting this article would be a clear case of systematic bias against non-English speaking countries. I have restored the speedily deleted Malabon article as the city is even larger, and the article is no different to East Hertfordshire District Council election, 2015. Number   5  7  21:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes the basic requirements of WP:NEVENT and WP:V.--RioHondo (talk) 00:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.