Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calumpang Family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. TravellingCari 18:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Calumpang Family

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

It would be better if you would not delete it. it is a family history not a product and certainly not SPAM! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.74.138 (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Better if not deleted..[?].. why? just because it is a family history or not a spam doesn't mean it should be kept. Axxand (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Every family has a history; but not every family is entitled to have their history here in wikipedia.--Shoowak (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * If you read the reason for deletion (and follow the link), you will see that it is proposed for deletion because of notability concerns - which can impact any type of article. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 09:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per my reasoning in Articles for deletion/Calumpang which still applies.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.   — bluemask  (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'd still apply my original arguments in the orignial AfD mentioned by Lenticel. --- Tito Pao (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per Lenticel's argument.  Why not create wikis from notable members instead of creating one whole wiki about a non-notable clan? Starczamora (talk) 02:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The notability of one person should adhere to his totality, individuality, contributions, importance, popularity and influence. The notability of a whole clan--,also, should adhere to each constituents's totality, individuality, contributions, importance, popularity and influence. The Calumpangs, of course, are not comparable to the Uchihas in the Naruto world. Axxand (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Or, closer to home, the Zobel de Ayala family. Starczamora (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Or, for those outside the Philippines, the US's Hilton family and, of course, the British Royal Family. --- Tito Pao (talk) 07:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.