Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvary Christian High School

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. A majority wanted deletion, quite a few wanted BJAODN (which suggests they consider the content unencyclopedic but of some amusement value). While I'm tempted to interpret the BJAODN's as delete votes, I think there's the germ of an encyclopedia article here, and BJAODN does not necessarily imply deletion; it's a comment on content. There is some concern that the existing content may be a copyright violation, and this should be addressed in the appropriate place. If no attempt is made to turn this into a neutral encyclopedia article, relisting on VfD after 28 days may be in order. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 10:54, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * See talk page for further discussion.

Calvary Christian High School
This well-written parody article deserves a spot in BJAODN (reminds me of the Landover Church website), but it doesn't belong in the regular article space. Too bad the scrofulous school articles we have to put up with don't rise to this standard of excellence. Denni &#9775; 00:33, 2005 July 14 (UTC)

DELETE: This is the page's original author. I started working on this page planning for it to be a true school website. When a friend came over to visit one night though, we decided to have a little fun with it. We would like it deleted now though, all evidence destroyed so-to-speak, to prevent any offense in the future. Thanks. -Hermes- DELETE: Co-creator would rather have the page deleted. We wish to cause no controversy. -Apollo-
 * I don't do this a lot, but delete unless basically rewritten from scratch before end of VfD. JYolkowski // talk 01:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN --Carnildo 02:45, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Creator would like it deleted, not moved to BJAODN. -Hermes-
 * 'keep this please but move it to the bjadon like carnildo suggested a real one can be made later by the original authors Yuckfoo 21:03, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN! will accomodate it... the article space will not. GarrettTalk 09:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per author request - BJAODN might be a good choice - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  14:29, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Just because author regrets he made the article doesn't mean that we have to listen to him- when he hit the submit button, he released it into GFDL.  Besides, it's funny, and deserves its own spot in BJAODN.   ral  315  23:21, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * First of all, I don't regret making the article. Secondly, it's not a matter of what you don't have to do, but one of respect and kindness. -Hermes-

Delete First of all, "Willmcw," accurate scrutinization will reveal that everything below goals is not a copyright violation. Read the text carefully. Such prudence is crucial when broadcasting such bold claims to such a large constituency. -Apollo-
 * Delete It's not nice to keep an article just because the creator says to delete it. 64.109.253.204 04:27, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as Wikipedia is not a webspace provider, and the original author has requested its deletion. --Idont Havaname 22:43, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, part of it is funny, but there will be more funny articles. Everything from the "Goals" section down is a copyright violation from here: . -Willmcw 04:51, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * 'Keep Article has been edited well beyond the author's right to request deletion M0rd0r 21:03, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Still a copyvio. The changes you've made don't seem extensive enough to make it a protected parody. --Carnildo 17:49, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Keep the article m0rd0r? It's just a big joke. -Hermes-
 * Keep - I cant see any reason to delete this page! - The Time Killer

Does this need to be moved to Votes for deletion/Old?
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.