Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin Blake III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Calvin Blake III

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable "up-and-coming" actor lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Claim to fame is "Demon Spirit #2" in a nn film. Should be a CSD candidate.  ttonyb (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless more work is done, this article probably qualifies for deletion as a non-notable blp. As a side note, this was a speedy delete (a7) candidate. I chose not to delete it because for A7 specifies that no claim to notability exists- in this case such a claim did exist, ergo no speedy delete. l'aquatique  [talk]  23:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's arguably a speedy as WP:SPEEDY for A7 includes the condition that the claim for notability be a credible one, and this isn't really a credible claim. But since it's here at AFD, we might as well cross the t's and dot the i's.  There is absolutely no coverage of significance in reliable sources to establish notability.  There is no indication that his role as "Demon Spirit #2" has won him major critical notice or awards. -- Whpq (talk) 21:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. A7 might be a stretch as it "does" kinda make an assertion of importance (and an A7 assertion is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability)... its just that in the light of more stringent notability criteria, the assertion fails. Short career fails WP:ENT, "Up-and-coming" fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:MUSICIAN, and lack of coverage fails WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:27, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.