Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin and Hobbes: the Animated Cartoon Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Non-admin Procedural close Wrong venue. Original editor of content has been blocked and userpage content should be deleted through Miscellany for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Calvin and Hobbes: the Animated Cartoon Series


Hoax article created by a sockpuppet. Freshh (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Why is a user page being discussed at AfD? הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 03:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Please note that this should not be discussed here, as these are userpages. In addition, the material is difficult to review as they have been redirected by the nom to the hoaxes policy.  This is a bit hurried, and probably not appropriate given the circumstances of the nomination.   dci  &#124;  TALK   04:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've reverted the edits by Freshh to the userpages' original state. Freshh, despite these being probable hoaxes, it is extremely inappropriate to do that to another person's userpage and would be considered vandalizing. There are better ways to deal with stuff like that, but redirecting it in that manner is not the appropriate way to do it. It's not your userpage. The other thing is that stuff of this nature is very hard to get deleted from someone's userpage. Why? Because it's not the mainspace and you can't really find any of this without really going out of your way to specifically find that one user and go through their edits. If the user has a history of hoax articles, then bring it up at the admin board or through the vandalizing board. In this particular case the user has been blocked and it's highly unlikely that they'll do anything more with the user page. You could potentially try nominating this through Miscellany for deletion. I don't think you'd have much issue, but stuff like this is usually ignored in general because there's little chance of it doing any harm. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.