Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Green Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Green Party of England and Wales; redirects are cheap, and this is a potential search term. GlassCobra 03:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Cambridge Green Party

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be purely self-promotional Jayen 466 14:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - advert article. Tnxman307 (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Green Party of England and Wales, this isnt a seperate party as it clearly states in the lead. -- neon white user page talk 16:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge same as Neonwhite Ijanderson977 (talk) 22:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * In my view there is nothing much to merge, since the page only has content specific to one city. We do not usually have pages for party organisations specific to a particular city. There is no London Green Party, Birmingham Green Party, nor Cambridge Conservative Party or Boston Republican Party, for that matter. Jayen 466 15:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * If the 'organisation' section can be sourced, there nothing to stop the main party article having sections on local groups. -- neon white user page talk 20:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I doubt that the Green Party of England and Wales article would benefit from the addition of the names of the Cambridge committee members. If we wanted to add such names of local committees, I would have thought that Cambridge – a city with a population of 115,000 or so, ranked 171st in the UK according to our article on it – would not be the first U.K. city we should start with.  Jayen 466 23:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.