Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge University Students’ Union Lesbian, Bisexual, Gay and Transgender Campaign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, the arguments of IPs on the keep aren't particularly convincing as opposed to those of the delete voters. -- JForget 23:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Cambridge University Students’ Union Lesbian, Bisexual, Gay and Transgender Campaign

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A student society/grouping at an individual university is far from unique or individually notable. The article is entirely an internal description of what the group provides. Timrollpickering (talk) 22:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, Non-notable club or group. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 23:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete 4 Google hits. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 00:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable student organisation without any independent sourcing Ohconfucius (talk) 10:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. See my long note on the talk page of the article. The article is purely a description of the activities of the organisation. It has no evidence to show that it has wider social, cultural, or historical importance, nor that it has enjoyed any significance outside the world of the university.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and non-verifiable Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Wikipedia can be a NPOV, the page needs work and facts, not deletion. 193.171.84.30 (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Once the very existence of such a society would have been noteworthy. Fortunately the UK has become more tolerant. --Simon Speed (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but get rid of if the page doesn't improve, I can totally see why people wanna get rid of it. 193.170.20.110 (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.