Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge corridor cricket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete (actually revert move back to User:Qwertg) —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-04 02:06Z 

Cambridge corridor cricket
Appears to be a hoax entry Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, and that. Tevildo 13:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NFT made up at university. I'm sure I've seen this in an AfD previously. MLA 14:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as student wank. — sjorford++ 14:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete BJAODN. And no I'm not just saying that because when I was at Cambridge there were no decent corridors outside my room. David | Talk 14:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as already deleted and BJAODN'd per Articles for deletion/Corridor cricket. JPD (talk) 16:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, I knew I remembered it from somewhere, and it didn't seem to be from my three years at the best University in the world. It's a clear G4 speedy deletion (I won't do it as I have voted here - would mean closing an AfD in which I have participated). David | Talk 18:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD-G4 - re-creation of deleted material. Fails WP:HOAX. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 22:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.