Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge visual networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  12:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Cambridge visual networks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to locate sources for company. Tried under "Cambridge Visual Networks" and under "Camvine" without success. Also tried to isolate searches with the name of company directors mentioned in the article and unable to locate anything other than Wikipedia and mirror sites. CNMall41 (talk) 02:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of notability. Alexius08 (talk) 12:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP -- HighKing ++ 21:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.