Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camelot Lost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Camelot Lost

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book that satisfies no criteria of WP:NB. Also, duplicate article -- a nearly identical article already exists at "Camelot Lost", which I also nominated for deletion earlier. (I would have nominated them both at the same time, except that I just noticed this article... not sure if there's a way to combine the two AfD entries, but if there is and a more experienced editor wants to do so, then of course by all means be my guest.) --Smeazel (talk) 23:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Note: I've boldly changed the incorrectly titled article to a redirect and closed that AfD. Please take a look at Articles for deletion/"Camelot Lost" and consider those arguments also, as the articles were identical.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - does not meet WP:NB-- S R X  23:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article asserts no notability and fails WP:BOOKS and WP:RS. --  JediLofty UserTalk 09:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-published books are seldom notable, and there's no idication this one is. Article appears to exist solely to advertise the book.  Also, considering the duplicate article, Salt. Edward321 (talk) 14:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.