Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CameraLK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

CameraLK

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article, the majority of the sources are press releases or otherwise connected to the company. ... disco spinster   talk  16:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  16:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  16:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * As the creator, I cannot see any sources connected to the company. They are reliable sources talked about the company through interviews and other newspaper articles. I can sure 100% that those sources are reliable and true and no any link to the company. I could not understand that. May be some of them are Sinhala language, so some might cannot understand. Otherwise, how you say that newspapers such as Daily News, Lankadeepa, Sri Lanka Mirror, Sunday Observer, Ceylon Business Reporter, Daily Mirror and Derana Aruna are unreliable and not important? I don't know whether my comment may remove from here or not, but it is the truth. All are reliable. If someone think about any promotional stuff, so then remove that part only. Not the article as a whole. Thank You. Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 00:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: None of the articles in these publications have authors, isn't that strange? They are basically advertisements that look like newspaper articles. ... disco spinster   talk  14:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep After removing the promotional tone and as per available references that are from reliable resources. Not all the references are press releases. Passes WP:GNG. Johnson Wagart (talk) 03:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, press releases are suitable for WP: GNG.--37.26.33.99 (talk) 19:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * They are not. See WP:GNG: A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. MarioGom (talk) 12:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   B E C K Y S A Y L E S   13:55, 2 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article about a retail company which has around 70 employees. The article describes a company going about its business without indicating any claim to encyclopaedic notability. Notability is not inherited from the various brands for which a company has distribution agreements (including being "the youngest Sony distributor competing in the market" ) Coverage of various sponsorships of events and donations to individuals is included in the article and announcement-based references but WP:CORPDEPTH places "sponsorship of events, non-profit organizations, or volunteer work" as Trivial coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 10:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment It is not only about the company. It is a prominent brand in Sri Lanka, where a small island worth 70 employees as well as help government during COVID-19 situation. Also, the company is important in humanitarian aspects as they help poor children around the country. Do not look at this only through profitable way. That is why it is passing WP: GNG, WP:RS, WP:AUD and WP:MULTSOURCES. Deletion is not the thing, but to Improve the article just like above admins. Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 23:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.