Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camerapedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 05:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Camerapedia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable website ( camerawiki camerapedia.org), one single news source in news (the other being just a mention of the site). No further independent sourcing. Low stability, especially since it was recently being taken over by Wikia (and moved to camerapedia.wikia.com) resulting in the formation of camera-wiki.org. Dirk Beetstra T C 10:32, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Questions. (i) When you write Non notable website (camerawiki.org) do you perhaps mean Non notable website (camerapedia.org)? (ii) I'm puzzled by your statement that there's (a) one single news source in news yet (b) No independent sourcing; do you mean that the news source is not independent, or do you mean No other independent sourcing, or what? -- Hoary (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * oops, yes, I meant camerapedia.org, have redacted that, and added a 'further'. All current sourcing is not independent from the subject, leaving only one single source (which is not used at the moment, but may be of interest).  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 13:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  —Hoary (talk) 12:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  —Hoary (talk) 12:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  —Hoary (talk) 12:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. fails wikipedias inclusion criteria of our general notability guidelines. Non-notable Social wiki community for camera enthusiasts which recently was absorbed by wikia. Google news gives only one result(blog) about a non-notable spinoff site created in late january, which is not particularly relevant to the article in question here or helps establishing its notability. Further searching results in merely trivial coverage or mentions. No significant third-party coverage could be found --Hu12 (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient independent coverage. Pburka (talk) 04:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.