Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Bay (pornographic actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to HIV/AIDS_in_the_pornographic_film_industry. There is consensus that she is not notable per BLP1E. There is no consensus whether the article should be redirected or merged and redirected. By default, I replace it by a redirect, whoever wants to use the info is welcome to merge it using the page history.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Cameron Bay (pornographic actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is about a pornographic actress who I believe fails WP:PORNBIO and is really known only for getting infected with HIV. While the repercussions of the HIV outbreak probably merit a mention in HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry, I believe that this article runs afoul of BLP guidelines. The Call of Cthulhu (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry per BLP1E principles. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry.Per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz's argument. Finnegas (talk) 17:56, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge with HIV/AIDS_in_the_pornographic_film_industry. Guy1890 (talk) 23:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment i had not been able to find an article which this content might go in. the target article proposed is logical, and i had not found it prior to creating my article. im neutral on the merge/redirect, but can easily see the logic in it, with BLP1E, while not an ironclad rule on its face, obviously to be considered.(mercurywoodrose)99.14.218.225 (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge non-personal content to HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry. then delete original article without redirect. This is, as argued above, really about the HIV outbreak, not the person. We should not leave a redirect in this case,  on WP:BLP1E principles: there is no reason to name patients in this sort of article, unless there is particular notability and relevance, which there is not in this case. -- The Anome (talk) 10:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The only issue that I have with the above arguments is that it is this person here that caused the outbreak in question, and that fact has already been covered by numerous mainstream media sources, like the Los Angeles Times, the New York Daily News, ABC News, etc. I see no reason to leave out the relevant info (from the article under consideration here) from the proposed merge target article, which I see that you've already pre-emptively edited. Guy1890 (talk) 01:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: If you want to use the name in that article, it's up to you, but the words "caused the outbreak" are not at all helpful. This sort of thing is exactly why BLP1E exists.  -- The Anome (talk) 07:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Cameron was also featured in the first season of Tool Academy so this is not a BLP1E. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't believe that appearing as a participant on a reality TV show is sufficient to contribute to meeting the notability criteria: she was in the show, the show was not principally about her, which is what is required by WP:N. -- The Anome (talk) 13:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.