Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Herold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Cameron Herold

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Alleged to be CSD eligible on spam/advertising grounds, however I think the article may just be in need of a good spit and polish. Any spitting and/or polishing will come after the afd which decides if the community thinks it should stay though. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Spam created by an undisclosed paid editor about a non-notable person. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:49, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - My searches such as this and this found nothing to suggest good independent notability. The article is neat and sourced but this would rather be moved elsewhere as he'd best known as COO. SwisterTwister   talk  04:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * delete vanity article if I ever saw one. Even with some clean up established editors it reeks of grandiose promotion. LibStar (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Hopeless; there's no point in even moving it to draft space. I do not see how a paid editor taking money for writing this sort of article is acting ethically, even not considering  of our terms of service.   DGG ( talk ) 17:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. TomStar81: Edits that created it are undisclosed paid advocacy, which is illegal in the USA. Keeping it would be aiding and abetting. --Elvey(t•c) 16:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.