Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Pierce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Cameron Pierce

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable BLP with one source that, naturally, does not meet WP:RS. Fails WP:AUTHOR on all four criteria and WP:GNG categorically, as well. — Chromancer  talk/cont 02:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I couldn't find anything either. tedder (talk) 02:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 02:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 02:53, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, severe deficiencies in sourcing. Peter Karlsen (talk) 03:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This doesn't exactly cut it either. Hey Tedder, good to see you again. Drmies (talk) 03:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete' fails WP:NOTABILITY, cannot find any significant coverage on this article. -  Dwayne   was here!   &#9835;  03:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails notability criteria for authors. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  09:53, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable author with no significant coverage. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (not notable). Also in existence is Pierce's own website, but to add that to the article's one source would still leave out sources written by a third party. Jsayre64   (talk)  00:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I was hoping to find prominent lit-mag contributions, but only found a piece in The Pedestal VASterling (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is this article hosted by The Guardian. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.