Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Potts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Nomination withdrawn in good faith. heading towards WP:SNOW'''. LibStar (talk) 02:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Cameron Potts

 * – ( View AfD View log )

this has been tagged for a while for notability and sources issues. i cannot find any indepth coverage to meet WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BIO. all the article has in one source from the not so reliable www.mp3.com.au nothing in gnews and all google comes up with is one line mentions. the most indepth is this and not exactly a major music media source. LibStar (talk) 08:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep self evident from improvement SatuSuro 10:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * whilst it looks a lot of sources at least 7 of the added sources are mere one line mentions which confirm that he was a member of certain non notable bands. LibStar (talk) 14:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Strong Keep after extensively reasearching, it is clear that Potts is a notable artist, participating in a number of notable bands, which have undertaken numerous international tours, mostly organised by Potts. He is also a published author. Dan arndt (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satusuro's edits show that Potts meets MUSICBIO and GNG. Nice work. Jenks24 (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep As above. Not heaps, but enough to keep.Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep If ninetynine and Baseball are both notable, then Potts automatically is under point six of WP:MUSICBIO. Baseball have the weaker claim (and a dreadful article) but there's enough there, particularly on touring and membership (other than Potts) to suggest they qualify relatively easily. They've also survived AfD in the past. BlueThird (talk) 02:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per point six of the guidelines for musicians. Notability on his own may be borderline, but Potts is notable enough for Wikipedia. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)*
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.