Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Tate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under a combination of our Vandalism and Biographies of living persons policies. Prior deleted versions of the article give this person's date of birth. I am therefore deleting it as a wholly unsourced (auto)biography of a minor who has not been confirmed to be a public figure. Moreover, this account has created other articles about xyrself that have already been deleted as quite transparent hoax vandalism; and the prior deleted autobiographies differ from this one in what they claim this person to have done. Uncle G (talk) 01:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Cameron Tate

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Created by User:Cameron Tate, clear conflict of interest here. Was speedied before apparently under A7 but now includes claims of notability. A PROD would likely be declined, so here we go. No notability. Google search brings up absolutely nothing, so no references exist to establish notability. Possible hoax. Tagged as such. N F 24 ( happy holidays! ) 22:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Only claims are to have appeared as an extra and in commercials, and "will appear" in future movies. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Author has instances of vandalism  and of adding his name . AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Forgot to add in my !vote: Delete as nom.  N F 24 ( happy holidays! ) 23:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. And when you look at the guy's talk page, User_talk:Cameron_Tate, it becomes clear we've been down this road before. Why do people write articles about themselves when they've used their own names as their user names, and then have the balls to re-create their autobiographies when they've been deleted? Beats me. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I tagged the article for speedy deletion twice in three hours and they *still* recreated it. Makes me wonder what they're thinking sometimes.  N F 24 ( happy holidays! ) 00:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.