Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camila Guiribitey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The quality of arguments is poor on both sides, and we lack a serious discussion of the quality of the sources the article cites or that have been proposed here.  Sandstein  07:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Camila Guiribitey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

doesnt appear to be a notable youtuber, sources are just a name drop or the equivalent of "take care of your mental health, says on YouTuber!" Praxidicae (talk) 11:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable Youtuber.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep There are enough sources to meet WP:GNG. Granted, they are mostly in Spanish but that isn't an issue, especially given that a decent chunk of her audience-base appears to be in Latin America/Caribbean. Personally, I can't quite see what she has done to warrant notability (besides posting on social media), but I feel that way about most "influencers" who meet requirements. IphisOfCrete (talk) 21:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Also I've added new reference from https://cdn.com.do/ She is quite notable in latin america with over 1.7 million followers.
 * Comment - She has been significantly featured in El Nuevo Diario (República Dominicana), laneta.com (in Spanish), CiberCuba (in Spanish), Hoy Digital (in Spanish) making her notable. 2019KB (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

There are other sources too of her attending latin's grammy and her pretty luxurious life but I haven't added because I'm not sure whether if it would be perfect for Wikipedia or not

She was invited on latin grammy: https://cdn.com.do/2019/11/20/camila-guiribitey-dice-que-sintio-mezcla-de-emociones-indescriptible-en-su-primera-vez-en-grammy-latino/

etc

] Sorry but I think that you have just checked first source, Please review other sources and let me know what you think, thanks  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep - sourcing is of the tabloid type, but I was able to verify that she does have 1,750,000 followers. Bearian (talk) 01:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Most of her coverage is in spanish news publishers but still she passes General Notability Guideline. 2019KB (talk) 15:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_YouTube/Notability#Principles 2019KB (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * comment Camila Guiribitey is notable too as per principles of Notability for YouTuber, Also she is passing WP:ENT

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – bradv  🍁  04:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Beside that the topic is significantly covered in reliable source (Spanish) and passes general notability as well as WP: ENT 2019KB (talk) 08:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * comment In my opinion, the article should be kept. Beside the nominator only one user has suggested for deletion!


 * KEEP SHE IS TRULY FAMOUS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by cubangirl (talk • contribs) — cubangirl (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.