Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilo Prieto Valderrama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus for notability. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 06:32, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Camilo Prieto Valderrama

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Colombian plastic surgeon turned environmentalist. Some minor coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Has an article on another Wikipedia, es.  scope_creep Talk  12:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete way too much newsy coverage to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hang on User:Johnpacklambert, in the two minutes you had after your delete vote at Articles for deletion/Barbara Snellenburg (2nd nomination), how did you have time to look at the 21 foreign language references here, and determine that they were all "too newsy" to meet GNG? That's not possible, and I once again have to question your competence to edit in the AFD area. Can you please explain your justification in detail, as I really think your topic ban on AFD participation needs to be expanded. Nfitz (talk) 23:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That really doesn't make sense and sounds a wee bit too aggressive. What happened to WP:AGF??  scope_creep Talk  01:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * AGF has limitations - I've pointed out these 20-second judgements time and time again, but nothing changes. At some point, it becomes a question of competence. See also the discussion at their topic ban - since then, they seem to have replaced the creation of far too many AFDs with voting delete at discussions with no discrimination and clearly not enough time for judgement. Enough is enough - this one is particularly blatant given the number of Spanish articles they'd have had to have looked at, in no time. I'd like a better understanding. Nfitz (talk) 03:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * This article has been posted for 26 hours so your argument makes no sense. scope_creep Talk  08:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The important thing about this doctor is his work as an environmentalist, participating in Colombia's environmental policy. I am going to refine the article by focusing on this facet. There are many references in main colombian newspapers with interviews. He has published several books and is quite popular on Colombian television, in addition to having received important awards in his country. He is also an outstanding activist --3erres (talk) 15:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  14:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: references are from relevant media: Diario El Tiempo, El Espectador, Radio Caracol, in addition to the Titanes award. Perhaps it requires a cleaning to be more encyclopedic.--Pesca59 (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He's a well-known Colombian. References are proper.--Fittipaldi92 (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * How well know is he? scope_creep Talk  01:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: Article has been trimmed of unencyclopedic material in the past week. Appears notable per Pesca59. Jusdafax (talk) 07:50, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.