Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camley Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:39, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Camley Street

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence the meets GNG. Notability is not inherited from a few notable places located there. The final paragraph claims it is notable for having a Neighbourhood Forum, but that is not verified in the sources and appears to be an assertion made in WP's voice. MB 23:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MB 23:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Sources cover places along Camley Street, not the street itself, and notability is not inherited. –dlthewave ☎ 18:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - I do not really know how this process works, and have spent an hour trying to understand it, but as I created the article I should probably comment. I did not realise the above, and believed it would be useful for the street to have an article to provide a framework for reference from the (I hope indisputably notable?) sites on it, so made no effort to make references in the article to its more "inherent" notability. However, there is also a big dispute about the street (not the sites that have their own article) in a regional newspaper (for example 1 2 3), and the developments on the street do get considerably media coverage from outside the area (for example 4 5 6 7 8. Fosse1884 (talk) 21:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  01:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Isn't the nomination a bit like saying United States is not notable because notability is not inherited from the places, people and events there? If buildings and developments on the street are notable (and they are) then from an editorial point of view it may well be sensible to cover them in an article on the street rather than insist the information is covered in separate articles on each individual property or is removed completely. The neighbourhood forum is now referenced. The topics we chose to cover in articles should be appropriately selected to help the reader. Thincat (talk) 04:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.