Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Bow Wow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Although merge was suggested, I see a strong consensus to delete and not merge. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Camp Bow Wow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has some coverage, but I don't think it meets WP:GNG or WP:ORG. A clear advert, so if kept would need TNTing. Boleyn (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. There was actually very little "advert" language that needed trimming, what remains seems pretty straightforward and descriptive even if it can be improved further. Pro tip: TNT is almost never the right answer. No opinion at this time on notability. postdlf (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Current does not prove notability for wp:Corp. References are just announcements or stock listing, reuter link no longer works.Delete if no one one improves it and proves notability.User:Davidstewartharvey
 * Delete Non-notable, not meeting GNG. --Micky (talk) 01:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet -Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect into Heidi Ganahl, which admittedly has similar problems with promotional tone & COI editing history, but will pass (for now). This one definitely does not.  --Lockley (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Let's take a look at the sources: (1) a company profile, (3) profile, (4) profile. (2) and (5) don't demonstrate the kind of coverage that warrants an article. 2 suggests perhaps a section in VCA Animal Hospitals might be appropriate. I don't think GNG is met. Furthermore, its current form is purely promotional, with no encyclopaedic value. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite: a franchise with 125 stores is a large enough scale for notability, if encyclopedic sources can be incorporated. --Prosperosity (talk) 02:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the GNG, and if not I'd TNT. I don't think there's anything in here that belongs in the article on the founder. PJvanMill  ( talk ) 20:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. In 2009, this shoddy stub would be acceptable as a good-faith effort, but it's been tagged for years by, and no real effort has been made to improve it. Bearian (talk) 19:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.